Charm builds and runs outbound for
+ others
+ others
On the call you told us what happened last time House of AMZ ran outbound: replies came, but they came from beginners. That is not a copy problem. It is a targeting problem, because a broadcast reaches whoever is easiest to reach, and beginners always are.
Serious brands leave trails that beginners never leave: ad budgets visibly scaling, new products launching, rebrands announced, marketplace roles being hired for. This document points House of AMZ at brands already spending real money on Amazon, at the exact moment their creative becomes the bottleneck.
+ others
Most Amazon agencies pitch within degrees of each other: PPC, ops, "full service." Your own site says the sharp version: "Many know design. Few understand Amazon. We're fluent in both." A brand owner reading a cold email sorts that in five seconds, and the campaigns below lead with it every time.
Active sponsored placements. Ad library activity that suddenly scales. Launch and rebrand press. Open marketplace-manager reqs. These trails cost money to leave, which is exactly why beginners never leave them. Filtering on spend evidence is the direct fix for the beginner replies you got last time, and every play in section 04 is built on it.
A brand scaling ads has already decided to bet on the product. Ads earn the click; the images, the A+ page and the copy decide the cart. So the pitch is never "spend more." It is "stop losing the money you are already spending," which is the easiest kind of yes there is.
ArtNaturals, International Plastics, Liebers and PrimeFive are named on houseofamz.com with testimonials attached. Unlike the restaurant deck, this side has visible proof from day one, and the campaigns link straight into it.
Every PPC and full-service Amazon agency without an in-house design team has your problem sitting inside their client accounts: ads they run pointing at creative they cannot fix. That is a partner motion, it mirrors the referral bench on the Mekupelet side, and it is play five.
You said it on the call: everyone pounds cold emails and it all feels the same. So volume alone loses here. Every sequence below opens on something observable about that specific brand's situation, offers something worth having, and stops after three touches. No breakup emails, no fake urgency.
Millions of sellers, and the serious minority is buried in them. The opening cut in section 02 filters hard on spend evidence and category, and we would rather start narrow and expand than spray the universe and refill your inbox with beginners.
The storefront name is rarely the company, and the company is rarely the decision-maker. The build resolves each brand to the founder, head of ecommerce or brand manager with a verified contact, the same records-to-person mechanic we ran for Hello Hero in section 07. Anything we cannot resolve gets dropped, not sprayed.
"Your listings look bad" is the fastest way to lose a founder who designed those listings at midnight two years ago. The copy never critiques what exists. It talks about what the brand is doing right now, the push, the launch, the rebrand, the hire, and offers the next version rather than a verdict on the last one.
Mekupelet and House of AMZ both land meetings on your calendar, and both need founder-led closes at this stage. Separate domains, separate suppression, separate reporting, so a deliverability event on one side never touches the other, and you always know which brand a reply belongs to.
A list of "Amazon sellers" is the same list every competitor mails, and it is exactly how a campaign fills up with beginners. Spend evidence is the filter that fixes it, because spend cannot be faked by someone who has none.
First, you. Your LinkedIn and your relationships, pointed at the agencies and operators who live next to your buyer. Founder-led, written in your voice with the automation smell stripped out, and live in week one because nothing needs to warm.
Second, the spend trails. Ad library activity and deviations, sponsored placement presence, launch and rebrand press, new catalog additions, marketplace and creative hiring. All observable, all dated. Each campaign pulls it fresh when we build that campaign.
And alongside the signals, straight volume. Generic angles run in parallel against the qualified brand universe, because sometimes the winning campaign is simply the right offer said plainly to everyone in the category.
Third, the whitelabel bench, built on purpose. PPC agencies, full-service shops without design teams, 3PLs and launch consultants each touch dozens of brands a year. That is a partner motion, not a cold one, and one relationship can outproduce any single campaign.
Two LinkedIn seats run human-paced and proxied, one of them yours. Founder-led copy pointed at the agency and operator channel, where LinkedIn is strongest in this category.
Ad activity, launches, rebrands, hiring. Pulled fresh for each campaign, resolved to the named decision-maker at the brand, scored by how recent and how big the trail is.
PPC and full-service Amazon agencies without design teams, whitelabel or referral. They feel the creative gap on every account they manage, and each one compounds.
Eight campaigns a month, each one a permutation of buyer moment, category and angle. Every cycle is built from what the last one showed, until the messages that scale are obvious.
Every line here is a starting position, not a decision. The kickoff session exists so you can move these before anything is built.
This table is the heart of the engagement, not the whole of it. The signal plays run next to straight-volume campaigns testing generic angles against the qualified brand universe, and the two race each other. Nothing about House of AMZ needs repositioning. The offer needs to be put in front of the right brands at the right moments, and that is a campaign-count problem. The plays themselves are opening thinking: some ship as written, some change at kickoff, and some never go to market. The data and your instincts decide.
It is also the honest frame for the tier question in section 08. Eight campaigns a month tests your strongest buyer moment properly in the launch categories. Sixteen tests all three in parallel and runs the whitelabel bench as its own track. Either way, by month three you own a ranked answer to which moment converts best, and that answer outlives this contract.
Two LinkedIn seats, run human-paced and proxied, one of them yours. Brand founders are patchy on LinkedIn, but agency owners, ecommerce directors and marketplace operators live there, which is exactly who the whitelabel bench and the scaling-brand play need to reach.
Everything sent from your profile is written to sound like you on a good day. Variables earn their place or they come out, because an agency owner who smells automation has learned everything about how much the relationship means. And when a prospect clicks your name, your profile does the rest of the selling, which is one more reason this channel belongs to you and not to a shell account.
Ad library activity, including the deviation read: a brand that suddenly adds ad sets is pushing product hard right now. Sponsored placement presence, the simplest public evidence that a brand pays for Amazon traffic. Launch and rebrand press, trade and DTC coverage that puts a date on a creative decision. Catalog additions, new ASINs appearing under an established brand. And marketplace and creative hiring, the reqs that mark a brand deciding to take Amazon seriously.
Each one answers why this brand and why this month. Everything is deduplicated and suppressed across plays, so no brand hears from House of AMZ three different ways in the same fortnight.
How the data actually works, said plainly. A campaign pulls its records at the moment we build it, filtered to the launch categories. The campaign runs, we score it, and the plays that earn it get promoted to a standing pull so they keep feeding themselves. That promotion is a decision we make together off the numbers, usually around week six.
"Your images are hurting your conversion" reads as an insult to the founder who made those images, and it is the default move in this category, which is exactly why it stopped working. The copy talks about what the brand is doing right now, the push, the launch, the rebrand, the hire, and offers the next version of their creative rather than a verdict on the last one.
And no spraying. The spend floor in section 02 means a brand with no visible investment in Amazon never gets a send at all. That is the difference between this round of outbound and the one that filled your inbox with beginners, and it is a filter we hold even when it makes the list smaller.
The play we sketched live on the call. A brand that suddenly scales its ad activity is betting real money on a product this quarter, and every one of those clicks lands on creative that either wins the cart or wastes the spend. The copy never critiques the creative. It asks the question every scaling founder is already half-asking themselves: the ads are working, is the listing keeping up?
The Amazon version of the restaurant deck's first-time opener. A brand that is strong on its own site and socials announces it is coming to Amazon, or new ASINs appear under a brand that barely had a presence. Everything gets decided right now: the listing set, the A+ pages, the storefront, and whatever creative ships on day one earns the first weeks of reviews. Arrive before the launch and you are the first credible voice in it.
A brand announces a new identity or new packaging, and for the next few months its Amazon catalog wears the old look while its site and socials wear the new one. Shoppers notice the mismatch before anyone internally has time to fix it, and someone on the brand team already owns the cleanup and dreads it. That person has a budget, a deadline, and no bandwidth, which is the exact shape of a great creative client.
An open req for a marketplace, ecommerce or Amazon manager tells you the brand has decided to take the channel seriously and funded it. The obvious play, "do not hire, use us," insults the person who wrote the req and gets deleted. The play that works assumes the hire happens and makes their first quarter productive: whoever lands the role inherits the catalog as-is and spends months wishing the creative were better before they can prove anything.
The channel hiding inside your own category. Every PPC and full-service Amazon agency without a design team runs ads into creative they cannot fix, and they feel it on every underperforming account. You become their creative department: whitelabel or referral, whichever fits, the same way other agencies already send you the design half. One warm bench relationship touches dozens of brands a year. This runs from your profile, in your voice, and it sounds like a person because it is one.
Plus the person who runs them. Which, in a studio where the founder is also the creative director and the closer, is the hire you cannot make yet.
Every tool above sits on our licenses and is run by our team. At the Engine tier you pay $3,500 a month and the stack behind it lists at more than that on its own, before anybody's time.
The ninety-minute working session: categories confirmed, the three buyer moments ranked, the spend floor agreed. Suppression loaded for both agencies. Both LinkedIn seats connected and the first whitelabel-bench messages go out from your profile. Cold domains ordered and warming starts in parallel.
Ad library, sponsored presence, launch and rebrand press, and hiring pulls built for the launch categories, all resolved to named decision-makers with verified contacts. First target lists back to you for review before anything sends. The before-and-after set from play five gets drafted with you.
All sequences written against your top two buyer moments and scored line by line. Low-volume soft launch on the new domains to prove deliverability before anything scales.
Cold plays running at full volume. Replies routing to you. First two-week cycle scored, and the next four campaigns built from what it showed. Weekly strategy call running, moving to every other week after month one, exactly as we said on the call.
A saturated mid-market category, a sales team stretched thin, and a need for targeting that cut through noise rather than more volume. The Amazon-services inbox is the same fight with more spam in it.
Intent-based outbound triggered on firms hiring specific roles and engaging with specific content, multi-touch across email and LinkedIn. Play four is that exact mechanic pointed at marketplace and ecommerce manager postings instead.
Real credibility in the space but no systematic outbound, and no clarity on which of many possible angles would produce pipeline. That is your question too: the scaling brand, the launch, or the rebrand first?
40+ campaign types A/B tested weekly across email, LinkedIn and inbound-led targeting, doubling down only on what converted. This is the direct answer to the thing you cannot decide from a standing start: which buyer moment should House of AMZ lead with, in which categories? You do not have to pick in advance. Campaign velocity is how you find out with data instead of an opinion.
Needed direct contact with decision-makers across thousands of US school districts, a universe that exists only inside public records, with the actual humans buried behind institutional entities.
Mapped every administrator in every US public school district from public data, resolved them to verified direct contacts, and ran parallel campaigns off that dataset. That is the identical build to turning ad activity, launch press and hiring boards into the named decision-maker behind each storefront. It is the single most transferable thing in this list.
Owner-operators who do not answer generic email, in a category that traditionally closed on relationship, with a buyer who was never sitting in front of a screen when the email arrived.
Signal data identified operators at the moment of expansion, with sends timed to the hours those buyers were actually reachable. The transferable finding: in relationship-led categories, when a message arrives moves reply rates more than what the subject line says. Every send window in your build inherits that.
A local provider competing against incumbents, where email and LinkedIn alone were not going to move the buyer. Charm built and staffed the dialing teams, then layered email and LinkedIn around the call cadence against the same prospect. It is in this document for one reason: if a play turns out to need a call layer in front of it, we have built one before rather than outsourced it.
Note: the metrics on this engagement are still being verified, so we have left them out rather than print numbers we have not checked.
Four campaigns every two weeks. Eight a month. Your two strongest buyer moments tested properly.
Eight campaigns every two weeks. Sixteen a month. All three buyer moments and the whitelabel bench, in parallel.
Engine tier: $3,500 × 3 plus the $1,000 onboarding. $19,000 at Engine ×2. No tool costs, no per-seat charges on top.
Your average project fee is the number we need on Monday. Against a full listing-set and storefront build, the math gets short quickly, and one whitelabel partner changes it entirely.
Set at kickoff, reported weekly.
Exactly what we said on the call: if the engagement has not returned its cost by the end of month three, we run month four entirely at our cost, full effort, nothing held back, and we will connect you with people we have run that month for so you can hear how it went. And at month three you choose: keep going, or take the campaign matrix, the copy and the signal pulls and run it yourself. They are yours either way.
Claim your guarantee →The ninety-minute working session from the call. We size the universe live against the categories and the spend floor, rank the buyer moments and set the opening cut. It ends with a target list on screen, not with a follow-up email.
The whitelabel bench goes live from your profile in the first few days, in your voice, sounding nothing like automation. In parallel, domains warm, the ad-library and hiring pulls get built and suppression loads for both agencies. You review every target list before a single message sends.
Cold plays live around week four at full volume. Every two weeks a fresh cycle of four campaigns ships, built from what the last cycle showed. Weekly call through month one, every other week after. At month three, you choose what happens next.
Pick a kickoff date. Week one is the parameter session, the ranked buyer moments, the spend floor, and your own profile talking to the agencies who feel your buyer's creative gap every day. None of that waits on infrastructure to warm.
Pick your kickoff date →